Integrated spatial proteomics of human PDAC uncovers an expanded tumour-immune-stroma spectrum with genomic associations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distinctively, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) consists of sparse tumour lesions intertwined with extensive desmoplastic stroma. The complexity of tumour-microenvironment interactions within this desmoplasia poses a challenge for accurate tumour profiling and patient stratification, and characterizes a profoundly chemoresistant tumour. Here we mapped the spatial relationships between tumour, stroma, and immune cell compartments delineating tumour and microenvironment types that expand the classical to basal spectrum of human PDAC. We used imaging mass cytometry to profile the in situ multi-cellular organization of 81 cell types in resected cases with paired whole genome sequencing. Cell types, functions, and pathway activation were distributed as highly reproducible environments in discrete locations throughout these tumours, which we deep-profiled using laser-capture mass spectrometry. We show that the connections between tumour phenotypes, vascularization, immune response, and stromal biophysical state are reinforced by genomic aberrations, altered by treatment, and associated with patient outcome. Predictive machine-learning models showed that spatial single cell data outperformed genomic or clinical features but integrated multi-omics models provide the best prediction of patient survival with compressed models requiring only 10 non-redundant robust molecular measures associated with the phenotypic spectrum of PDAC. Together, these findings define a phenotypic and molecular framework of PDAC that captures tumour-microenvironment co-dependencies and offers a refined basis for patient stratification and therapeutic targeting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".