Study of Medicinal plants used in Ayurveda for the treatment of Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ayurveda, the ancient Indian system of medicine, follows a holistic approach that emphasizes treating the patient as a whole rather than focusing solely on the disease. This distinctive methodology gives Ayurveda a special status among traditional healthcare systems. The present study explores the significance of twelve medicinal plants widely used in Ayurvedic formulations for the treatment of diabetes. These plants, in their entirety or through specific parts, are utilized in various therapeutic preparations. The rising global interest in Ayurvedic medicine is largely attributed to its minimal side effects and natural healing potential. For the people of Kerala, Ayurveda is an integral part of their cultural heritage, and their bodies are often more receptive to its remedies. This study aims to highlight the medicinal value of these plants and raise public awareness, which is essential for their conservation and sustainable use. In conclusion, Ayurvedic treatment offers a promising and natural alternative for managing diabetes, potentially benefiting the broader ailing population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".