MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413354762 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.03033-24

Predicting hydrocarbon presence in marine cold seep sediments using machine learning models trained with benthic bacterial 16S rRNA taxonomy

2025· article· en· W4413354762 on OpenAlexafffund
Rohan Khan, Tulika Bhardwaj, Carmen Li, Anirban Chakraborty, Jose Miguel Seoane, James M. Brooks, Bernie B. Bernard, Adam MacDonald, Natasha MacAdam, D C Campbell, Martin G. Fowler, Casey R. J. Hubert

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Nova ScotiaPetroleum Technology Research CentreGeological Survey of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Foundation for InnovationGenome Canada
KeywordsCold seepBenthic zonePhylum16S ribosomal RNAGeologyMicrobial population biologyHydrocarbon explorationContext (archaeology)EcologyBiologyOceanographyPaleontologyBacteriaMethane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Hydrocarbon seepage in marine sediments exerts selective pressure on benthic microbiomes. Accordingly, microbial community composition in these sediments can reflect the presence of hydrocarbons, with specific groups being more prolific in association with seepage. Here, we tested machine learning models with large 16S rRNA gene amplicon data sets derived from marine sediments in deep-sea hydrocarbon prospective areas of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico and NW Atlantic Scotian Slope. Utilizing H2O’s AutoML machine learning platform, it was determined that Gradient Boosting Machines performed best for creating 16S rRNA-based models that successfully predict the presence of hydrocarbons. Feature importance scores from the models revealed that in Gulf of Mexico samples, members of the Aminicenantia class (within the Acidobacteriota phylum) and the Sulfurovum genus (within the Campylobacterota phylum) were most diagnostic for the presence of low molecular weight hydrocarbon gases. The Campylobacterota lineage was also important in Scotian Slope sediments, along with sequences affiliated with the class-level JS1 group (within the Caldatribacteriota phylum) for determining hydrocarbon-positive sites. Testing these models in geographically distant seafloor basins showed that the microbial communities between basins varied sufficiently to prevent consistently accurate reciprocal predictions. However, models trained on a combined data set and filtered for important features performed substantially better, supporting the feasibility of generalized models under stringent feature selection. These results highlight the potential of seabed microbial taxonomy-based hydrocarbon seep site prediction when paired with refined sampling and consistent geochemical characterization. IMPORTANCE Our study showcases an important use of bioinformatics in an interdisciplinary context, by combining hydrocarbon geochemistry and microbial biodiversity DNA sequencing profiles. We trained and compared different machine learning models on 16S rRNA-based bacterial taxonomy data using 377 DNA sequencing libraries from marine surface sediments in two different hydrocarbon prospective marine basins from different parts of the global ocean to predict the hydrocarbon status of sediment samples. Of all algorithms tested, Gradient Boosting Machines worked best for this objective. Feature importance scores from the models highlighted that in Gulf of Mexico samples, members of the Aminicenantales order and Campylobacterota lineages were most diagnostic for the presence of low molecular weight hydrocarbon gases. The Campylobacterota lineage was also important in NW Atlantic Scotian Slope sediments, along with sequences affiliated with the class-level group JS1 (within the Caldatribacteriota phylum) for determining hydrocarbon-positive sites, though several features appeared to be basin-specific. Importantly, models had a high prediction accuracy when predicting samples from the same basin but were less effective in predicting the hydrocarbon status in reciprocal basin testing, pointing to the ecological differences in hydrocarbon-driven environmental selection in different parts of the ocean. However, combined models using a refined set of predictive features improved cross-basin performance, highlighting the feasibility of a broader application. Results highlight the exciting potential of microbial taxonomy-based machine learning models in predicting broader ecological, oceanographic, and geological phenomena at the biosphere-geosphere interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207