MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413358192 · doi:10.2196/73440

Deep Learning Approaches for Classifying Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Inertial Measurement Unit Hand Tracking Data: Comparative Study

2025· article· en· W4413358192 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Mutersbaugh, Wan-Chun Su, Anjana Bhat, Amir Gandjbakhche

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPreprintAutism spectrum disorderArtificial intelligenceDeep learningAutismInertial measurement unitComputer scienceTracking (education)Unit (ring theory)Machine learningPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition that can be quite difficult to diagnose due to a lack of objective diagnostic methods in the currently used behavioral assessments. Recent work has shown that children with ASD have a higher incidence of motor control differences. A compilation of studies indicates that between 50% and 88% of the children with ASD have issues with movement control based on standardized motor assessments or parent-reported questionnaires. Objective: In this study, we assess a variety of deep learning approaches for the classification of ASD, utilizing data collected via inertial measurement unit (IMU) hand tracking during goal-directed arm movements. Methods: IMU hand tracking data were recorded from 41 school-aged children both with and without an ASD diagnosis to track their arm movements during a reach-to-clean up task. The IMU data were then preprocessed using a moving average and z score normalization to prepare the data for deep learning models. We evaluated the effectiveness of different deep learning models using the preprocessed data and a k-fold validation approach, as well as a patient-separated approach. Results: The best result was achieved with a convolutional autoencoder combined with long short-term memory layers, reaching an accuracy of 90.21% and an F1-score of 90.02%. Once the convolutional autoencoder+long short-term memory was determined to be the most effective model for this datatype, it was retrained and evaluated with a patient-separated dataset to assess the generalization capability of the model, achieving an accuracy of 91.87% and an F1-score of 93.66%. Conclusions: Our deep learning approach demonstrates that our models hold potential for facilitating ASD diagnosis in clinical settings. This work validates that there are significant differences between the physical movements of typically developing children and children with ASD, and these differences can be identified by analyzing hand-eye coordination skills. Additionally, we have validated that small-scale models can still achieve a high accuracy and good generalization when classifying medical data, opening the door for future research into diagnostic models that may not require massive amounts of data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207