Evidence for late impact‐induced metasomatism on the brachinite parent body recorded by a phosphate assemblage in NWA 7828
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Brachinites are a group of ultramafic achondritic meteorites thought to sample a planetesimal from the early inner solar system. They yield predominately ancient crystallization ages within 4 Ma of CAI formation, and while the formation mechanism for these samples is debated, they are widely thought to be partial melt residues from a differentiated planetesimal(s). Here, we conduct a correlated microstructural (electron backscatter diffraction; EBSD), trace element, and U–Pb age (laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; LA‐ICP‐MS) study of a unique, large phosphate mineral assemblage in brachinite Northwest Africa (NWA) 7828 to constrain the origin and evolution of this sample and its parent body. Oxygen isotope analysis of NWA 7828 yields values in agreement with other brachinites and supportive of origin from the brachinite parent body. The phosphate assemblage is >90% chlorapatite, with merrillite occurring around grain boundaries and within fractures that crosscut the larger crystal. All calcium phosphate grains are highly crystalline, with domains of chlorapatite displaying <16° of internal misorientation, with merrillite displaying a range of unique orientations. When all concordant apatite and merrillite U‐Th‐Pb analyses are considered together, they yield a precise weighted average 207Pb‐206Pb date of 4431 ± 5 Ma suggestive of a single population recording their crystallization age. Textural, chemical, and isotopic measurements of NWA 7828 are hard to reconcile with the formation of the phosphate assemblage in an igneous environment, instead supporting a metasomatic origin. The relatively younger age of the assemblage (4431 Ma) places it outside the estimated prolonged heating period on the brachinite parent body, instead requiring a later source of energy such as through impact‐induced heating. This event coincides with the timing of impacts recorded by other brachinite (and brachinite‐like) meteorites, as well as impact ages recorded by some Apollo melt breccias, and suggests a widespread, significant bombardment event around 4430 Ma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".