Joint AP Selection and Power Allocation for Unicast–Multicast Cell-Free Massive MIMO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joint unicast and multicast transmissions are becoming increasingly important in practical wireless systems, such as Internet of Things networks. This paper investigates a cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output system that simultaneously supports both transmission types, with multicast serving multiple groups. Exact closed-form expressions for the achievable downlink spectral efficiency (SE) of both unicast and multicast users are derived for zero-forcing and maximum ratio precoding designs. Accordingly, a weighted sum SE (SSE) maximization problem is formulated to jointly optimize the access point (AP) selection and power allocation. The optimization framework accounts for practical constraints, including the maximum transmit power per AP, fronthaul capacity limitations between APs and the central processing unit, and quality-of-service requirements for all users. The resulting non-convex optimization problem is reformulated into a tractable structure, and an accelerated projected gradient (APG)-based algorithm is developed to efficiently obtain near-optimal solutions. As a performance benchmark, a successive convex approximation (SCA)-based algorithm is also implemented. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed joint optimization approach significantly enhances the SSE across various system setups and precoding strategies. In particular, the APG-based algorithm achieves substantial complexity reduction while maintaining competitive performance, making it well-suited for large-scale practical deployments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".