La culture religieuse à l’École : un sacrifice sur l’autel de la laïcité ? <sup/>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine l’abolition récente du programme scolaire Éthique et culture religieuse (ÉCR) au Québec et l’implantation de son successeur, le programme Culture et citoyenneté québécoise (CCQ). L’auteure avance que ce changement peut être vu comme le reflet d’une ambivalence des Québécois à l’égard de la religion et de l’évolution de la place de celle-ci dans la formation du citoyen. L’article commence par contextualiser l’histoire de la religion à l’école publique au Québec, puis discute des différentes conceptions de la laïcité qui ont influencé les débats entourant la place de la religion à l’école. L’article conclut en analysant les différences et éléments de continuité entre les programmes ÉCR et CCQ et évalue diverses implications pour le futur de la religion dans le système scolaire québécois. L’article s’appuie sur une variété de sources, incluant des articles académiques, des documents gouvernementaux et des articles de presse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".