Dissecting lentil crop growth in contrasting environments using digital imaging and genome‐wide association studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The development of high‐throughput phenotyping platforms to capture time‐series data on large, diverse populations holds promise for crop researchers and breeders investigating growth‐related traits. We used imagery from unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) with red/green/blue (RGB) and multispectral cameras flown over multiple site‐years in Saskatchewan, Canada, and Metaponto, Italy, to gather data for crop height, area, and volume in a lentil diversity panel (324 genotypes). The temporal nature of the UAV image‐derived data enabled the modeling of growth curves for volume, height, and area, something that would be impractical under traditional phenotyping procedures in such a large population grown in multiple environments. A principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering revealed differential growth patterns across contrasting environments, with large variations in temperature and photoperiod, within our lentil diversity panel. Combining this analysis with genome‐wide genotyping data, we identified markers, from an exome capture array (267,845 single nucleotide polymorphisms), associated with crop growth that could be used for marker‐assisted selection. Our study demonstrates the potential for UAV‐based imaging to obtain large‐scale time‐series data across multiple environments to model growth curves and investigate genotype‐by‐environment interactions. In addition, we can now use phenotypic traits that were once impractical to collect and derive novel phenotypes to improve our understanding of crop growth and the genetics underlying adaptation in lentil, approaches that will be useful for both researchers and breeders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".