The Effect of Intense Chorus Waves on the Storm‐Time Outer Radiation Belt Relativistic Electron Dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We investigate the effects of intense chorus waves (wave power ) on relativistic electrons (E 0.5 MeV) in the heart of the outer radiation belt ( = 4–6) using superposed epoch analyses. Combining electron flux and electromagnetic wave measurements from 70 geomagnetic storms during the Van Allen Probes mission, we show the relationship between integrated chorus wave power (0.1–0.8 equatorial electron gyrofrequency) and changes in relativistic electron flux on two‐hour timescales. During the loss‐dominated storm main phase (Superposed Epoch −0.5 to 0 days), intense chorus waves mitigate the net loss of relativistic electrons. Conversely, in the early recovery phase (Superposed epoch 0–0.5 days), flux increases across a range of relativistic energies regardless of chorus wave power. The amount of electron flux at keV energies appears to have an influence on the consequences of chorus wave activity during geomagnetic storms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".