MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413363956 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.212

Optimization of fuel transportation using a multi-product pipeline with intermediate pumping stations: gasoline, diesel, and Jet A-1

2025· article· en· W4413363956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDiesel fuelGasolinePipeline (software)Jet fuelAutomotive engineeringJet (fluid)Product (mathematics)Process engineeringEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringWaste managementOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a numerical investigation to optimize a multi-product pipeline involving five fuel storage facilities: one departure terminal and four receiving facilities, over a weekly planning horizon. It considers the phenomenon of contamination due to product mixing at the contact zone. The pipeline transports gasoline, diesel, and Jet A-1 to meet market demand during the planning period. An objective function is formulated for multi-product pipeline fuel transportation under given constraints, and Mixed-Integer Linear Programming with the CPLEX solver is employed as the simulation tool. The optimized sequences derived reduce contamination, maintain sufficient fuel stock levels, ensure the timely delivery of required quantities, and minimize operational costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it