MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-scale analyses of flow separation around rectangular prisms in uniform flow

2025· article· en· W4413365064 on OpenAlexafffund
Sedem Kumahor, Xingjun Fang, Robert J. Martinuzzi, Mark F. Tachie

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsScale (ratio)Separation (statistics)Materials scienceComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Investigated turbulent flow around prisms with AR = 1, 2, and 3 using TR-PIV. • Identified dual-frequency vortex shedding unique to AR2 due to intermittent reattachment. • Used vorticity-based POD to resolve multi-scale coherent structures and KH instabilities. • AR2 showed largest spatial/temporal scales and broadest enstrophy distribution. • Demonstrated non-monotonic wake behavior with aspect ratio. Turbulent flows around infinitely spanned rectangular prisms in uniform flow with streamwise aspect ratios, AR = 1, 2, and 3 were studied using time-resolved particle image velocimetry (TR-PIV) at a Reynolds number of 16,200 based on free-stream velocity and prism height. These aspect ratios span regimes that transition from direct shear layer shedding in the wake (AR1) to intermittent reattachment (AR2) and mean reattachment on the prism surface (AR3). The mean flow topology, Reynolds shear stress, and turbulent transport were analyzed. Spatiotemporal characteristics were investigated using two-point correlation, integral time scales, reverse flow areas, and proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of the vorticity field. The results reveal non-monotonic variations of statistical and structural characteristics with aspect ratio. The case of AR2 possesses the largest recirculation region as well as the largest spatial and temporal scales of coherent structures. The wake exhibits quasi-periodic fluctuations concentrated in a single frequency for AR1, and AR3 but dual frequencies for AR2. The POD of the vorticity effectively decomposed a wide range of scales. Depending on the aspect ratio, spectra of the POD coefficients revealed concentrated spectral energy at the dominant vortex shedding frequency, its harmonics and at Kelvin-Helmholtz instability frequencies associated with small-scale vortices near the leading edge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heat and Fluid FlowSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207