Leveraging linked data for space constraints checking of mobile cranes in modular construction assembly lookahead planning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preparing constraint-free lookahead schedules (LAS) in the assembly stage of dynamic modular construction (MC) projects requires checking space availability for mobile crane operation using heterogeneous, distributed information sources. Current automated crane space evaluation methods rely on centralized information databases, whereas linked data based approaches are limited by insufficient geometric computation capabilities. This study proposes a framework to model and validate the space constraints for mobile crane operations using the semantic web. It starts with developing an ontology to represent crane lifting space requirements on the semantic web. Information sources, including construction site point clouds, 4D building information models, and crane specifications, are semantically interconnected using linked data. Shapes Constraint Language JavaScript Extension performs constraint validation through JavaScript-based mathematical computations utilizing the Separating Axis Theorem and a triangulation-based approach to check space for crane placement and rotation, respectively. Validation on two MC sites demonstrated the framework’s effectiveness in identifying space constraint violations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it