MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413367364 · doi:10.1111/petr.70160

Right Ventricular Dysfunction by Echocardiography Is an Early Marker of Evolving Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Children After Heart Transplantation

2025· article· en· W4413367364 on OpenAlexaff
Judith Namuyonga, Aslak Widerøe Kristoffersen, Nassiba Alami‐Laroussi, David Youssef, Jennifer Conway, Michael Khoury, Lily Lin, Luke Eckersley, Nee Scze Khoo, Simon Urschel

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineStollery Children's HospitalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyCardiac allograft vasculopathyInternal medicineHeart transplantationTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the leading cause of late graft loss in children after pediatric heart transplantation (HTx). Coronary angiography, the reference standard for diagnosis, is invasive and carries a risk of complications. Noninvasive echocardiographic methods to reliably identify CAV in children have not yet been defined. METHODS: This study assessed the utility of functional echocardiography (FE) in the diagnosis of CAV in children. We prospectively assessed all children (< 18 years old) post-HTx during routine clinical surveillance between 2005 and 2020. For this study, we compared patients diagnosed with CAV (angiographic ISHLT criteria) with transplanted children without CAV, with FE at the time of diagnosis (d-CAV) and 6-12 months before diagnosis (pre-CAV), and evaluated clinical risk factors. RESULTS: We identified 10 children with CAV and 11 matched controls (CON). Right ventricular longitudinal strain (RV LS) and strain rate (RV LSR) were reduced at d-CAV (d-CAV RV LS, 12.1% [9.2,16.1] vs. CON RV LS, 21.5% [18.2,25.7]; d-CAV RV LSR, 0.75%/s [0.48, 0.98] vs. CON RV LSR, 1.35%/s [0.95,1.50], p < 0.01 for all) and pre-CAV (pre-CAV RV LS, 17.3% [10.8,20.2] vs. CON RV LS, 21.5% [18.2,25.7]; pre-CAV RV LSR 0.95%/s [0.80,1.10] vs. CON RV LSR, 1.35%/s [0.95,1.50], p ≤ 0.05 for all). Patients with CAV were more likely to have class II donor-specific antibodies (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Right ventricle systolic strain parameters were reduced as early as 12 months prior to CAV diagnosis, while the left ventricle functional parameters remained preserved. FE of the right ventricle may be a useful noninvasive tool for early recognition of developing CAV in transplanted children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207