MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413367845 · doi:10.2224/sbp.13976

Perceived neighborhood disorder and depression among Chinese adults in low-income rural households: A moderated mediation model

2025· article· en· W4413367845 on OpenAlexaff
Chunyu Yang, Xiang Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Behavior and Personality An International Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediationPsychologyDepression (economics)Moderated mediationLow incomeDemographic economicsSocial psychologyEconomicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the psychologicalmechanism underlying the association between perceived neighborhood disorder (PND) and depression. Self-reported data collected from 675 adults living in low-income rural households in China were used to test our theoretical model. The participants completed the Perceived Neighborhood Disorder Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Perceived Stress Scale. The results indicated that PND was positively associated with depression, anxiety mediated this relationship, and perceived stress moderated all the paths among PND, anxiety, and depression. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Behavior and Personality An International JournalSame topicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation StudiesFrench-language works237,207