MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413368086 · doi:10.34172/hpp.025.43444

The association of serum phospholipids levels with chronic liver diseases: A systematic review of observational studies

2025· review· en· W4413368086 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Promotion Perspectives · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyMedicineAssociation (psychology)Systematic reviewMEDLINEInternal medicinePsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic liver disease (CLD) influences the levels of diverse metabolites that may be related to its pathogenesis. The study aimed to indicate the relation between CLD and the levels of phospholipids. Methods: In this systematic review, PRISMA guidelines were considered for reporting the results. Up to November 2024, the databases of MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. Case-control (CC) and cross-sectional (CS) studies explored the link between CLD and serum phospholipids. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for CC studies and the modified NOS scale for CS studies were applied to evaluate the quality of the included articles. Results: A total of 11304 articles were included. Eleven thousand duplicates were removed, 9304 studies were excluded, and 343 full-text articles were reviewed. Fifteen CC studies and four CS studies were included in this study. Quality assessment using NOS revealed most studies had low to moderate risk of bias, with scores ranging from 4 to 8 out of 9.The included studies verified a significant association between the levels of total PL (TPL), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidic acid (PA), lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and liver diseases., with reported odds ratios ranging from 1.44 to 2.51 and correlation coefficients from -0.58 to 0.62. Conclusion: Phospholipid levels are associated with liver diseases. It is important to identify noninvasive ways to diagnose biological risk factors in patients with liver damage so they can be targeted for early treatment. Most of the included studies revealed significant alteration of phospholipid levels in CLD. Thus, the lipidome can predict liver dysfunction and prevent its attributed complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it