MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413373529 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2025-0317

Deterioration mechanism of adhesion properties of FRP–soil interface induced by moisture

2025· article· en· W4413373529 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pengchang Wei, Zhen‐Yu Yin, Yijie Wang, Fu‐Ping Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringMoistureMechanism (biology)Fibre-reinforced plasticInterface (matter)AdhesionWater contentMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyComposite materialWetting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deterioration of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)–soil interfacial adhesion due to water intrusion has been a core issue in geotechnical engineering, but its microscopic mechanism remains unclear. In this study, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation method is employed to reveal the microscopic deterioration mechanism of water on adhesion properties of epoxy–quartz (i.e., FRP–soil subsystem) interface, the structural and dynamic characteristics of interlayer water film. The steered molecular dynamics pulling simulation and the modified Bell's model are used to evaluate the adhesion energy of epoxy–quartz interface in dry and wet cases. The simulation results show that (1) the interfacial water film weakens adhesion strength of epoxy–quartz interface, playing a dual role in “interface isolation” and “lubrication”, aggravating the interfacial debonding. (2) The work of adhesion, maximum pulling force, potential of mean force, and adhesion energy of dry system are significantly higher than those of wet system. (3) The interlayer water film has a distinct layered structure: bound, free, and sparse water layers, which have different angle orientations and density distributions. (4) The diffusion coefficient increases with the rising thickness of free water layer, which may trigger a capillary-seepage effect and aggravate interface deterioration. This study provides atomic-scale insights into moisture-induced FRP–soil interface failure mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207