MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413376189 · doi:10.3390/buildings15162975

Reliability of Non-Destructive Testing for Appraising the Deterioration State of ISR-Affected Concrete Sleepers

2025· article· en· W4413376189 on OpenAlexaff
Rennan Medeiros, Maria Eduarda Guedes, Leandro Sanchez, Antônio Carlos Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueBuildings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringNondestructive testingMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concrete sleepers are essential components of railroad infrastructure, yet their service life has been reduced by one-third due to deterioration caused by internal swelling reactions (ISR), leading a major Brazilian railroad to replace millions of sleepers within a decade. This study investigates the reliability of various non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques to estimate damage levels in concrete sleepers. The methods evaluated include surface hardness testing, stress wave propagation, electromagnetic wave propagation using ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity, and resonant frequency. These techniques were applied to assess sleepers diagnosed as affected by alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and delayed ettringite formation (DEF) at different deterioration degrees. Although findings indicate that most NDT methods are limited and unreliable for quantifying ISR-induced damage, resonant frequency testing combined with energy dissipation analysis provided the highest accuracy across all damage stages and was able to capture microstructural changes before significant expansion occurred. These results support the use of vibration-based screening tools to enhance early detection and guide condition assessment of railroad infrastructure, helping to reduce the premature replacement of ISR-affected concrete sleepers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBuildingsSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207