Reliability of Non-Destructive Testing for Appraising the Deterioration State of ISR-Affected Concrete Sleepers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Concrete sleepers are essential components of railroad infrastructure, yet their service life has been reduced by one-third due to deterioration caused by internal swelling reactions (ISR), leading a major Brazilian railroad to replace millions of sleepers within a decade. This study investigates the reliability of various non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques to estimate damage levels in concrete sleepers. The methods evaluated include surface hardness testing, stress wave propagation, electromagnetic wave propagation using ground-penetrating radar (GPR), electrical resistivity, and resonant frequency. These techniques were applied to assess sleepers diagnosed as affected by alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and delayed ettringite formation (DEF) at different deterioration degrees. Although findings indicate that most NDT methods are limited and unreliable for quantifying ISR-induced damage, resonant frequency testing combined with energy dissipation analysis provided the highest accuracy across all damage stages and was able to capture microstructural changes before significant expansion occurred. These results support the use of vibration-based screening tools to enhance early detection and guide condition assessment of railroad infrastructure, helping to reduce the premature replacement of ISR-affected concrete sleepers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".