MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AI-Powered Woman Safety Application with Real-Time Audio-Based Trigger and Emergency Alert System

2025· article· en· W4413380228 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V P Ilakkiya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAudio visualMedical emergencyEmbedded systemReal-time computingComputer securityMultimediaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AI-Driven Female Safety App will be a real-time emergency reporting system, that will be voice initiated and will help support the needs of damaged/unsafe individuals in an unsecure or compromised situation. This solution incorporates Artificial Intelligence (AI) to recognize a list of pre-defined emergency keywords eg; "help," "save me" etc., through an Android smartphones continual background listening ability. This app will be designed to continually listen for these keywords and upon recognition will go through a sequence of automated actions including, haring live location through GPS, recording audio, turning on a siren noise, turning on the flash light, and then automatically notifying the required emergency contacts. This type of tool will allow recordings to operate entirely autonomously and passively - without any action or engagement from the Ontario woman. As above, if a woman is unconscious, paralyzed or restrained, this type of app can be very beneficial. The app will use an efficient, lean model of AI dedicated to keyword spotting that will rely on already established smartphone sensor APIs for microphones, GPS, and flashlight. Not only is the app being designed to detect an emergency accurately and reliably, it will also address concepts of false positives, privacy, and power consumption by utilizing a modular design, with configured configurability thresholds. This step relies on utilizing existing technology that can provide not only personal safety and security (that will become increasingly important for women), but provide a low-cost, scalable, user-friendly safety tool that is using any modern installed version of the Android device and the sensors already included, and not extra hardware from another device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchSame topicIoT and GPS-based Vehicle Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207