MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413382855 · doi:10.58931/cot.2025.2239

Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Integration of Radiation and Immunotherapy for All Stages

2025· article· en· W4413382855 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Daaboul

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian oncology today. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHôpital Charles-Le Moyne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyLung cancerCancerMedicineRadiation therapyOncologyCancer researchInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small cell lung cancer is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. New treatment paradigms have developed with the incorporation of new therapies in the last few years, aiming to improve patient survival. Some emerging therapies include the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy. This article provides a practical review of the current and upcoming treatment options for SCLC in both limited and extensive stages, focusing on integrating radiation and immunotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian oncology today.Same topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207