MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413386198 · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113784

Occupancy estimation and activity recognition in smart buildings using open set domain adaptation

2025· article· en· W4413386198 on OpenAlexafffund
Ons Abderrahim, Jawher Dridi, Manar Amayri, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOccupancyDomain adaptationAdaptation (eye)Computer scienceEstimationSet (abstract data type)Domain (mathematical analysis)Building automationArtificial intelligenceArchitectural engineeringEngineeringMathematicsPsychologySystems engineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart buildings (SB) optimize energy use to help the world achieve better sustainability while supporting energy efficiency goals and reversing climate change. Successful occupancy estimation (OE) along with activity recognition (AR) provides essential functionality to accomplish these objectives through the modification of building systems (BS), including heating and lighting. However, developing robust models for SB tasks is challenged by the scarcity of labeled data. Thus, the need for domain adaptation, that aims at adapting a model trained on one domain (source) to perform well on a different domain (target). Traditional closed-set domain adaptation (CSDA) methods have a critical limitation: they assume shared classes between source and target domains, which is unrealistic in many applications. Open Set Domain Adaptation (OSDA) provides a more realistic solution, assuming that only a few categories are available in both domains, making OSDA methods more suitable for SB. This paper presents four novel OSDA approaches: OSDA by backpropagation, OSDA with soft rejection, Unknown Aware Domain Adversarial Learning (UADAL) for OSDA, and Adjustment and Alignment (ANNA) for unbiased OSDA, to address these challenges. Evaluated on offices and residential apartment datasets, our top-performing method achieves 92% accuracy, a 0.89 F1-score on known classes, and an 85% unknown-class detection rate. These techniques differentiate between known and unknown target classes through adversarial training, reducing negative transfer, and improving feature alignment. The OSDA methodologies show notable improvements through testing on SB datasets. This indicates that OSDA implementation in SB can result in significant energy savings and improved sustainability. The code is available in this repository: https://github.com/ons-abderrahim/OSDA-to-Improve-Occupancy-Estimation-and-Activity-Recognition-in-Smart-Buildings .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Building EngineeringSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207