MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413391110 · doi:10.1115/omae2025-157556

Towards More Accurate Prediction of Transport Properties of Hydrogen Over Wide Pressure/Temperature Conditions Using Entropy Scaling Theory and Volume-Translated Cubic Equations of State

2025· article· en· W4413391110 on OpenAlexaff
Changxu Wu, Huazhou Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingThermodynamicsStatistical physicsEntropy (arrow of time)Volume (thermodynamics)Equation of stateMaterials scienceMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrogen is an important energy source due to its renewability, high energy density per unit mass, and clean combustion. Accurate prediction of transport properties (i.e., viscosity, thermal conductivity, and self-diffusion coefficient) of hydrogen plays a crucial role in the design, operation, and optimization of various hydrogen-based industrial systems. In this study, we combine the entropy scaling theory with the volume-translated cubic equations of state (i.e., volume-translated Soave-Redlich-Kwong equation of state and volume-translated Peng-Robinson equation of state) proposed in our previous study, leading to the development of entropy-scaling-based transport property models. Compared to the conventional models, these improved models are capable of more accurately predicting the transport properties of hydrogen at pressures from triple-point pressure (i.e., 0.01 MPa) to 300 MPa and temperatures from critical temperature (i.e., 33.15 K) to 600 K. More specifically, the new models coupled with the volume-translated Soave-Redlich-Kwong equation of state (i.e., VT-SRK EOS) yield %AADs of 3.09, 5.03, and 3.19 in predicting viscosity, thermal conductivity, and self-diffusion coefficient, respectively. The proposed models coupled with the volume-translated Peng-Robinson equation of state (i.e., VT-PR EOS) also perform well in predicting these three transport properties, with %AADs of 2.96, 4.94, and 2.43, respectively. It is also worthwhile mentioning that the VT-SRK EOS and VT-PR EOS can completely reproduce the critical volume of hydrogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207