MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413391428 · doi:10.1115/omae2025-156977

Experiments on Displacement of Viscoplastic Fluid in an Annulus With Wavy Inner Wall: Applications in Primary Cementing

2025· article· en· W4413391428 on OpenAlexaff
Yosef Rezaei, Marzieh Alishahi, Soheil Akbari, I.A. Frigaard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscoplasticityAnnulus (botany)Displacement (psychology)Materials scienceMechanicsGeologyStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringFinite element methodComposite materialConstitutive equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study delves into the dynamics of displacement flow within an annulus characterized by sinusoidally varying gap widths, aiming to replicate the effects of borehole irregularities on flow behavior. The experimental setup mimics a scenario where a spacer fluid displaces the mud initially within the annular region of the well. Our experiments utilize miscible fluids with physical and rheological properties similar to those found in field fluids. Specifically, the displacing fluid, brine, emulates a wash, while the displaced fluid comprises a non-Newtonian Carbopol solution, representing drilling mud properties. The annulus was positioned vertically and the displacing fluid was injected from bottom to top. High-speed cameras were used to capture the instantaneous behavior of the displacement flow. Our investigation reveals that the presence of yield stress in the displaced fluid leads to residual viscoplastic fluid remaining within the wavy annulus, predominantly at locations where the gap width is at its maximum. Continuous injection of the displacing fluid is necessary to eliminate these residual layers effectively. The main purpose of this study is to broaden the industry’s perspective on designing effective cementing jobs, which are vital in the construction of oil and gas wells, by including some assessment of the effects of geometric irregularity in the annular geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→