MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413391669 · doi:10.1134/s1995080225606447

Flow Analysis and Price Elasticity Assessment of Thai Jasmine Rice in the Logistics System Using Mathematical Models

2025· article· en· W4413391669 on OpenAlexaff
Wichai Witayakiattilerd, Jirabhorn Yamkleeb, Andrei Volodin, Wararit Panichkitkosolkul

Bibliographic record

VenueLobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsElasticity (physics)Mathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research focuses on the flow analysis and price elasticity assessment of Thai jasmine rice in the logistics system using mathematical models. The study aims to understand the movement of rice from producers to consumers and the impact of price changes on supply and demand within a complex distribution network. The research uses linear regression models and elasticity calculations to identify key nodes and paths in the logistics system that significantly affect rice distribution and pricing. The findings highlight the responsiveness of rice supply and demand to price changes, emphasizing the role of key distribution nodes. These insights are crucial for improving production, logistics management, and pricing strategies to enhance the competitiveness of Thai jasmine rice in the global market. The research concludes with recommendations for improving the efficiency and sustainability of the logistics network for Thai jasmine rice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLobachevskii Journal of MathematicsSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207