MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413391790 · doi:10.1115/omae2025-157199

Assessment of Fully Eulerian Phase-Field Framework for Ship Hydrodynamics With Ice Interaction

2025· article· en· W4413391790 on OpenAlexaff
Biswajeet Rath, Xiaoyu Mao, Rajeev K. Jaiman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEulerian pathField (mathematics)Phase (matter)Marine engineeringSea iceMechanicsGeologyAerospace engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental sciencePhysicsEngineeringOceanographyLagrangianMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The harsh and dynamic environment of the Arctic poses significant challenges for ship design, particularly concerning the interaction between ship hull/propeller system and ice. The development of efficient and robust ice-going ships that can navigate ice fields with minimal resistance and local load on the hull, is an emerging application of fluid-structure interaction. Traditional methods of modeling ship-ice interaction often fail to capture the complex dynamics involved. High-fidelity numerical models are imperative to accurately predict the complex and coupled dynamics to optimize the design and operating parameters of ice-going ships. The complex hydrodynamics and contact dynamics involved in the ship-ice interaction result in structures undergoing large translational and rotational motions. In this paper, we present a first-of-its-kind parallelized 3D finite element solver as a powerful tool to model the ship-ice interaction. The unified continuum approach enables simulating multiphase dynamics across fluid and solid domains on a fixed Eulerian mesh. Interfaces are captured via a novel interface-preserving and geometry-preserving phase field method. We assess the proposed fully-Eulerian solver by modeling and analyzing submerged steel-ice contact dynamics as a relevant benchmark problem. Finally, a demonstration of a realistic ship entering an ice field follows, where we compare the ship resistance in an ice field against that in open water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→