An Explicit Direct Method for Transient Stability Analysis of Multimachine Power Systems With Nonzero Transfer Conductances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose an explicit analytical direct method for the transient stability analysis of multimachine power systems with nonzero transfer conductances (TCs). The proposed method addresses two issues. In the first issue, we study the transient stabilization of the entire power system through excitation control design. To this end, a globally well-defined Lyapunov function is constructed, and a locally well-defined dynamic passivity-based control law is proposed. The closed-loop equilibrium is therefore guaranteed to be locally asymptotically stable. In the second issue, we study the transient stability property of post-fault initial states. To this end, an optimization-based approach to calculate the critical level set of the proposed Lyapunov function is proposed. This allows to estimate an explicit region of attraction of the closed-loop equilibrium. Therefore, the transient stability property of a post-fault initial state can be directly assessed. A case study on the IEEE 10-machine 39-bus power system, to demonstrate the performance and effectiveness of the proposed direct method, is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".