MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413397874 · doi:10.1002/9781394323555.ch05

The Role of the Military in Security and Support for Civil Authorities

2025· other· en· W4413397874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary and Defense Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceComputer securityPublic administrationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter explores the multifaceted roles of military forces in domestic security, emergency response, and disaster relief across seven nations: Italy, France, Australia, Canada, Israel, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The analysis commences with a case study of Operation Forza Paris in Sardinia (1992), demonstrating military-police cooperation in territorial control and crime reduction. The chapter then delves into the domestic roles of military forces in each country. Italy's military aids civil authorities in homeland security missions, including law enforcement, disaster management, and national territory defense. France prioritizes military involvement in population protection, civil security, and national territory defense. Australia employs the military for natural disaster relief and counterterrorism, while Canada offers extensive support in search and rescue, disaster relief, and law enforcement. Israel's Home Front Command focuses on urban search and rescue, civilian casualty management, and public education. The United Kingdom's Army Reserve is responsible for civil response, with the Civil Contingency Reaction Forces providing various types of support. Germany's Territorial Army is tasked with disaster relief operations, while Italy's Carabinieri and Guardia di Finanza serve as primary law enforcement and border policing forces, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMilitary and Defense StudiesFrench-language works237,207