MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413398865 · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05798-9

Whole genome sequencing and annotations of Trametes sanguinea ZHSJ

2025· article· en· W4413398865 on OpenAlexaff
Rathna Silviya Lodi, Xiuwen Jia, Peng Yang, Chune Peng, Xiaodan Dong, J. H. Han, Xiaofei Liu, Lizeng Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyGenomeComputational biologyDNA sequencingWhole genome sequencingEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trametes sanguinea belongs to the polyporaceae family and its fruiting body possesses several benefits. In the current study, Trametes sanguinea ZHSJ (T. sanguinea ZHSJ) isolated from the chestnut tree wood was studied for its whole genome sequence and transcriptome sequence with their annotations. T. sanguinea ZHSJ genome is 41.3243 Mb in length with a total of 135 contigs with N50 contig length 2.8138 Mb. A total of 10886 genes of T. sanguinea ZHSJ were annotated. Further, RNA sequencing and assembly represented 11861 genes, out of these 10,507 genes were annotated with four annotation databases. Moreover, denovo prediction annotation performed by Funannotate represented 12,268 coding genes and simple sequence repeats (SSR) prediction represented total 1,242 SSR and among them 707 were trinucleotide repeat motifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207