MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sulfur Vacancy and V-Doped CoP-Modulated 3D Zr-MOF (UiO-66-NH<sub>2</sub>)/2D MoS<sub>2</sub> Interface Restructuring for Efficient and Durable Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

2025· article· en· W4413399491 on OpenAlexaff
Mang Muan Lian, Su-Min Lee, Bo-Sang Kim, Jung‐Ho Yun

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaKyung Hee University
KeywordsVacancy defectRestructuringMaterials scienceDopingHydrogenCatalysisSulfurChemical engineeringCrystallographyChemistryMetallurgyOptoelectronicsBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integrated Zr-based MOF/MoS 2 (UiO-66-NH 2 /MoS 2 ) electrode was synthesized via a one-step hydrothermal in situ method for electrocatalytic hydrogen production. By leveraging the synergistic properties of UiO-66-NH 2 and MoS 2, the improvement of active site accessibility, conductivity, and electrochemical response was achieved. Sulfur vacancy engineering induced the restructuring of electrode composites, thereby improving the electrocatalytic activity and stability of the integrated electrodes. Modification of the UiO-66-NH 2 /MoS 2 electrode through the electrodeposition of vanadium-doped cobalt phosphate (VCoP) demonstrated further enhancement on hydrogen evolution reaction with a current density of 3 mA/cm 2 at 0.95 V, with a low overpotential of 25.74 mV dec –1 in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 . The doping effects of V 3+ and Co 2+ facilitated charge separation and interfacial charge transfer with enhanced stability, attributed to the improved physicochemical interaction within the restructured electrode architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207