MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413400506 · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-01858-z

Determination of lymph node metastasis using quantitative ultrasound elastography of papillary thyroid carcinoma nodule: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4413400506 on OpenAlexaff
Alisa Mohebbi, Saeed Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Ebrahim Ghaffari, Afshin Mohammadi, Nathalie J. Bureau, Ali Abbasian Ardakani

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Imaging · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisElastographyNodule (geology)Cochrane LibraryThyroid carcinomaLymph node metastasisUltrasoundCarcinomaRadiologyMetastasisThyroidInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and purpose papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) as the most common thyroid tumor, tends to invade adjacent organs, especially lymphatic system. This study aimed to evaluate the discrimination performance of ultrasound elastography (USE) in assessing PTC nodule for determination of cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM). Methods The protocol was pre-registered at ( https://osf.io/r5tc8 ). Using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, studies published up to March 10, 2025, were identified. Data extraction was conducted independently, and a random-effects bivariate model was applied to estimate pooled differentiation accuracy estimates. Results Twenty-one studies were included involving 7559 patients; 2790 (36%) were positive for CLNM, while 4769 (63%) were negative. The pooled E mean values for positive and negative CLNM were 51.2k Pa (95% CI: 42.6 to 59.7) and 44.8 kPa (95% CI: 35.2 to 54.4), respectively. It represents an absolute increase of 6.14 kPa (95% CI: 2.70 to 9.59) in the metastatic group compared to the benign group. Additionally, the pooled E max value for positive and negative CLNM were 87.9 kPa (95% CI: 49.5 to 126.4) and 68.7 kPa (95% CI: 44.2 to 93.1), respectively. This corresponds to an absolute increase of + 19.57 kPa (95% CI: 2.96 to 36.18) in the metastatic group, representing a more dramatic elevation compared to E mean values. The thyroid nodule E max and E mean were significantly higher for positive CLNM of + 27.5% (95% CI: 10.5–44.5%) and + 12.9% (95% CI: 5.1–20.7%) respectively. Combining USE with conventional ultrasound improved differentiation accuracy, achieving a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI: 62–90%), specificity of 79% (95% CI: 70–85%), and an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.88). Conclusion USE parameters demonstrated potential as a discrimination tool for the preoperative assessment of CLNM, particularly when combined with conventional ultrasound, which enhances its performance. Clinical trial number N/A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical ImagingSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207