Pulsed CO2 Laser-Fabricated Cascades of Double Resonance Long Period Gratings for Sensing Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a detailed theoretical and experimental study of cascaded double resonance long period gratings (C DR LPGs) for fabricated sensing applications. The matrix description of cascaded LPGs is presented, and several important particular cases are considered related to the regular and turn around point (TAP) gratings. A pulsed CO2 laser was used to fabricate ordinary and cascaded DR LPGs in a photosensitive optical fiber. The responses of the fabricated C DR LPGs to surrounding refractive index (SRI) temperature as well to longitudinal strain have been studied. A statistical comparison of the SRI sensitivities of ordinary and cascaded DR LPGs is presented to outline the capabilities and advantages of cascaded DR gratings. It was experimentally established that the temperature dependence of the wavelength split at the TAP follows a logarithmic dependence and the sensitivity to temperature is inversely proportional to the temperature itself. We evaluate the temperature stability needed for SRI-based sensing application and the importance of fine-tuning to the operational point slightly after the TAP to ensure maximum sensitivity of the sensor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".