Score Your Way to Clinical Reasoning Excellence: SCALENEo Online Serious Game in Physiotherapy Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SCALENEo (Smart ClinicAL rEasoning iN physiothErapy) is an innovative online serious game designed to improve clinical reasoning in musculoskeletal physiotherapy education. Adapted from the “Happy Families” card game, it provides an interactive, structured approach to developing students/learners’ ability to categorize clinical information into families of hypotheses. This digital platform supports both self-directed and collaborative learning, eliminating the need for continuous instructor supervision while ensuring meaningful engagement. SCALENEo features a unique feedback and scoring system that not only assesses students/learners’ decision-making processes but also promotes cautious and reflective reasoning over random guessing. By aligning with evidence-based pedagogical strategies, such as serious games and formative assessment, SCALENEo offers educators a powerful tool to reinforce critical thinking, improve student/learner engagement, and facilitate deeper learning in clinical reasoning education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".