MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413402851 · doi:10.3390/cryst15080744

Temperature- and Emission Wavelength-Dependent Time Responses of Strontium Aluminates

2025· article· en· W4413402851 on OpenAlexafffund
Virgīnija Vitola, Tinko Eftimov, Kristian Nikolov, Samia Fouzar, Katrīna Križmane

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeLatvijas Universitātes FondsLatvijas UniversitateEuropean Commission
KeywordsStrontiumWavelengthMaterials sciencePhysicsOptoelectronicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the temperature- and emission wavelength-dependent time responses of previously reported precursor-driven Eu2+- and Dy3+-doped strontium-aluminate phosphors to create unique luminescent anti-counterfeiting tags suitable for detection with smartphones. A smartphone was used to detect the red–green–blue (RGB) components of the rise and decay time responses of the samples in a temperature range from 0 °C to 100 °C. The RGB color-dependent detection revealed a finer excitation/relaxation kinetics structure of the individual samples, which becomes evident in the decay responses. The results suggest another possibility for multilevel encoding and temperature sensor applications, and provides a foundation for developing a more accurate theoretical model of the energy transitions in phosphorescent materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystalsSame topicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear OpticsFrench-language works237,207