MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413403810 · doi:10.21037/jss-25-39

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for patients with degenerative spinal disorders and maladaptive psychological processes: an observational study

2025· article· en· W4413403810 on OpenAlex
Nathan Evaniew, Abdullah Alduwaisan, Victoria M. Smith, Tara Whittaker, Denise Eckenswiller, Elias Soumbasis, Robert L. Tanguay, W. Bradley Jacobs, Fred Nicholls, Alex Soroceanu, Ganesh Swamy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spine Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsOPKO Health (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcceptance and commitment therapyObservational studyPsychologyPsychotherapistMedicineClinical psychologyPhysical therapyPsychiatryIntervention (counseling)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients living with chronic pain may experience maladaptive psychological processes that include depression, somatization, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety. Spine surgery in the setting of maladaptive psychological processes can lead to poor outcomes, but intervention with acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), which is a specific form of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), may provide benefits. Our objective was to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of ACT for patients with degenerative spinal disorders awaiting surgery. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of data that were collected at a single academic center. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected before and after ACT, while awaiting spine surgery: Patient Health Questionnaire 9 item (PHQ-9) for depression, Patient Health Questionnaire 15 item (PHQ-15) for somatization, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Item Scale (GAD-7), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist, Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), and Pain Disability Index (PDI). Results: Among the 63 patients, ACT was associated with significant improvements for depression [mean change -3.3, standard deviation (SD) 6.5, P<0.001], somatization (mean change -2.9, SD 4.1, P<0.001), kinesiophobia (mean change -6.1, SD 10.8, P<0.001), catastrophizing (mean change -9.9, SD 14.8, P<0.001), anxiety (mean change -2.1, SD 6.2, P=0.007), injustice (mean change -5.5, SD 8.5, P<0.001), and pain disability (mean change -6.4, SD 17.4, P<0.001), but not PTSD (mean change -3.5, SD 14.3, P=0.06). Conclusions: ACT prior to spine surgery may be associated with significant improvements for many maladaptive psychological processes. These results suggest that implementation of ACT in clinical practice could be appropriate and that further research to understand effects on outcomes after surgery is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it