MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413407003 · doi:10.2196/54174

Theory-Based Mobile App Intervention to Promote Healthy Salt Intake Among Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4413407003 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Milena Sia Perin, Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme Gallani, Eduardo Augusto Fernandes Nilson, Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé, Marília Estêvam Cornélio

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Human Factors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services SociauxUniversité Laval
FundersUniversidade Estadual de CampinasFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialPsychosocialIntervention (counseling)UsabilityHealth promotionSelf-efficacyGerontologyPhysical therapyEnvironmental healthPublic healthInternal medicinePsychologyNursingPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nowadays, mobile health technology has been increasingly used for treatment and prevention at all levels of health care. Associating this technology with the promotion of healthy salt consumption-both cost-effective and cost-saving public health strategies-can reduce this risk factor that contributes significantly to the increase of noncommunicable diseases worldwide. Objective: We aim to assess the usability and the efficacy of a mobile app intervention-"Sal na Medida" app-on the promotion of a healthy salt intake among adults, based on the Behavior Change Wheel framework. Additionally, to investigate if intention, self-efficacy, and habit variables mediated the effect of intervention on salt intake behavior. Methods: An experimental, randomized, and longitudinal study that evaluated the intervention effect with assessments at baseline, postintervention (1 mo), and at follow-up (2 mo). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from participants recruited at primary health care centers. The behavior of salt intake and per capita salt consumption were the primary outcomes. Psychosocial variables of intention, self-efficacy, and habit were assessed as possible mediators. Usability was evaluated after 1 month and 2 months of using the app. Results: Eighty-six participants were randomized in the intervention group (IG; n=43) or control group (CG; n=43). Most of the participants were female (IG: n=36, 84% and CG: n=37, 86%). Usability of app intervention scored 77.8 points (on a scale of 0 to 100) among IG participants. There was a significant reduction in salt intake in IG according to the variables of per capita salt and the behavior of salt intake. Furthermore, at the end of the follow-up, individuals in IG were 63% more likely to have a lower salt intake than those in the CG. The regression analysis showed an increase in intention and the perception of self-efficacy, and a more pronounced reduction in the habit of using more than 3 g of salt/day in preparing meals in IG when compared to CG. Habit and self-efficacy were identified as mediators of the intervention's effect. Conclusions: The theory-based mobile app intervention for reducing salt intake has shown promise both in terms of usability and efficacy among adults. Conducting further studies to assess its potential for implementation on a larger scale would be valuable for determining its real-world impact and feasibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Human FactorsSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207