MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413408525 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1629434

A novel automated CT biomarker to predict outcomes in acute ischemic stroke: net water uptake

2025· article· en· W4413408525 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hyun Woo Kim, Ananya Iyyangar, Sergio Salazar‐Marioni, Albert J. Yoo, Luca Giancardo, Sunil A. Sheth, Jerome Jeevarajan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiomarkerMedicineStroke (engine)Ischemic strokeInternal medicineCardiologyIschemiaBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Recent trials of large core thrombectomy have shown that our traditional understanding of infarct characteristics and reperfusion benefit may be incomplete for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) has wide inter-rater variability, and modern studies have also shown that reperfusion therapies can benefit some patients regardless of the ASPECTS. Reproducible imaging metrics that account for the degree of hypo-attenuation on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) may be better suited to guide treatments. Here, we evaluate Net Water Uptake (NWU), a novel NCCT metric that can be calculated in a rapid and automated fashion, to determine its predictive performance for identifying clinical outcomes in patients with AIS compared to ASPECTS. Methods From our prospectively collected registry encompassing 11 certified stroke centers, we identified patients with AIS. CT images were pre-processed and segmented, then NWU was calculated by automated comparison of density on ipsilateral and contralateral brain regions. Primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for competing multivariable regression models with Average NWU versus ASPECTS to predict 90-day outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Regression models were adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), tPA administration, and endovascular therapy. Secondary analyses included subgroup comparisons of patients with large infarct core and late time window. Results Among 402 subjects with anterior circulation AIS, median age was 69 [IQR 57–80], 49.3% were female, median NIHSS was 11 [IQR 5–19], median ASPECTS was 9 [IQR 7–10], and median 90-day mRS was 3 [IQR 1–5]. The ASPECTS-based model performance was not significantly different from the NWU-based model to classify 90-day mRS outcome, with AUROC 0.732 and 0.749, respectively, (p = 0.513 with Delong test). Among the subgroups, performance was again similar, including patients with large infarct core (AUROC 0.795 vs. 0.863, p = 0.312) and late time window (AUROC 0.638 vs. 0.677, p = 0.267). Conclusion NWU is a quantitative metric that can be rapidly and automatically obtained from non-contrast CT with comparable performance to ASPECTS when predicting 90-day functional outcome across a wide range of AIS presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207