Drowning in urban growth: rethinking flood resilience and spatial equity in Lagos, Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Urban flooding in Africa, intensified by climate change, poses a major challenge to sustainable urban development. In megacities like Lagos, the relationship between rapid urbanization and increased flood risk remains underexplored. This study investigates the interactions between urban expansion and flood occurrence in Lagos, identifies key contributing factors, and proposes strategies to enhance urban resilience. Methods Urbanization data were obtained from the UN-Habitat database, while flood data were sourced from the Emergency Events Database (EM-DAT) maintained by the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Time series analysis was combined with qualitative review of secondary data to examine trends, spatial distribution of floods, and underlying causes. Results Nigeria has experienced dynamic urban growth, with Lagos' population increasing from 7.28 million (1995–2000) to 17.15 million (2020–2025), a growth rate 2.4 times higher than the national average. Spatial analysis identified Lagos as a flood hotspot, with 35 recorded events-particularly concentrated in Victoria Island's Lekki area (7 events) and in Kosofe, Ikeja, and Agege districts (3 events each). Contributing factors fall into four categories: environmental, socio-economic, institutional, and structural. Flood impacts include agricultural land degradation, water pollution, erosion, infrastructure damage, crop loss, poverty aggravation, and public health risks such as the spread of infectious diseases. Discussion Despite resilience measures such as modern infrastructure (e.g., the Great Wall of Lagos) and institutional frameworks (e.g., Lagos State Emergency Management Agency), effectiveness is hindered by governance issues, limited trust, and insufficient community engagement. Strengthening communication, integrating climate-tailored early warning systems, and fostering active community participation in flood management could enhance trust and long-term resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".