MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413411456 · doi:10.1080/00071005.2025.2537929

Equality of Condition? Exploring Minority Ethnic Group Experiences of Education in Northern Ireland

2025· article· en· W4413411456 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Educational Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNuffield Foundation
KeywordsEthnic groupGender studiesGroup (periodic table)Minority groupSociologyNorthern irelandPolitical scienceEthnologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The period since the signing of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement in 1998 has seen an exponential rise in inward migration to Northern Ireland, with around 8% of the school-age population now comprising children and young people from minority ethnic groups. In this paper, we examine the experiences of families from minority backgrounds, including recent migrants and those from generations previously settled in Northern Ireland, as they navigate school choice and the transition from primary to post-primary education in a system characterised by academic selection and denominational segregation. Drawing on an ‘equality of condition’ framework, relating to the purposes and processes of education (Lynch and Baker, 2005), and adopting a qualitative approach, our findings highlight the interplay between identity categories, accrued or accessed social, educational, economic capital, and formal and informal power structures in mediating school experience. We propose that dimensions and intersections within this dynamic may contribute to equality of condition deficit for some minority families as they seek to secure primary and post-primary school placement for their children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it