Younger Dryas glacier advances in the tropical Andes driven by increased precipitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There is currently a debate about the timing and drivers of former glacier behaviour and climate change in the tropical Andes. Using 10Be dating we determined the ages of 21 boulders on moraines in the Santa Cruz Valley, Peru (∼10°S, altitudes ~ 4100 to ~ 4300 m a.s.l.). Former glacier extent is marked by a suite of nested outer lateral and terminal moraines. These moraines are dated to 11.1 ka, 11.6 ka, 11.8 ka and 12.0 ka, falling within the Younger Dryas Chronozone (YDC; ∼12.9–11.6 ka). Nine 10Be samples from the Lake Arhuaycocha catchment document a period of glacier thinning and lateral contraction between 12.0 ka and 11.8 ka. Reconstructed glacier Equilibrium Line Altitudes (ELA) at 11.0 to 12.0 ka with an area–altitude balance ratio (AABR) of 1.00-2.50 are between 4675 and 4835 m a.s.l. for the Arhuaycocha glacier, between 4692 and 4832 m a.s.l. for the Taullicocha glacier and between 4800 and 4940 m a.s.l. for the Artizon glacier. These values represent a depression of 300–400 m in elevation compared to contemporary values for the ELA. We infer that the glacier advances at this time were driven by increased precipitation and that these changes were most likely a response to seasonal changes in the position of the ITCZ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".