The economic value of fishing competitions in Finland – insights from an online survey
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Competitive fishing events are organised competitions between anglers who fish for incentives that range from monetary and in-kind prizes to accolades and public acclaim. The scale of the phenomenon is globally notable, but their local economic impacts are not fully understood. Anglers often spend large amounts of money during competitions. In this study, we present the results from surveyed Finnish angling competition participants and their monetary expenses. The survey data reveal that fishing competition participants spend, on average, approximately €276 (S.D. = 217.5) per person per day on overnight competition trips, with travel and accommodation expenses making up the main share of the total costs. Interesting differences in expense patterns are detected between experiential angler segments. We reject the hypothesis of a simple linear correlation between income and angling competition expenditures. Overall, the study shows that angling competitions can be significant revenue generators with important direct and indirect impacts on the local economy of communities organising the tournaments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it