Adverse Childhood Experiences and Sarcopenia in Later Life: Baseline Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are linked to early and long-lasting mental health issues and somatic multimorbidity. Emerging evidence suggests ACEs may also accelerate physical frailty in old age. This study examines the association between ACEs and sarcopenia, an ageing-related disease and core component of frailty. METHODS: Baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), including 25,327 participants aged 45-85 years (50.3% female sex) were analyzed. Sarcopenia was defined using the revised European Working Group of Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) guidelines. ACE were assessed via the Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health Wave III questionnaire, covering eight ACE categories. Multiple logistic regression models examined the association between the number of ACE count and sarcopenia, which were adjusted for age, sex, education, income, and ethnicity. RESULTS: = 0.043), but this result was in the opposite direction we hypothesized. Sensitivity analyses confirmed findings across different operationalisations of ACE and sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Higher ACE exposure was not associated with sarcopenia in middle aged and older adults. The unexpected protective association in the oldest-old subgroup may reflect survival bias. Age-stratified longitudinal studies are needed to clarify this relationship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".