Sex-specific body fat distribution predicts cardiovascular ageing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cardiovascular ageing is a progressive loss of physiological reserve, modified by environmental and genetic risk factors, that contributes to multi-morbidity due to accumulated damage across diverse cell types, tissues, and organs. Obesity is implicated in premature ageing, but the effect of body fat distribution in humans is unknown. This study determined the influence of sex-dependent fat phenotypes on human cardiovascular ageing. METHODS: Data from 21 241 participants in the UK Biobank were analysed. Machine learning was used to predict cardiovascular age from 126 image-derived traits of vascular function, cardiac motion, and myocardial fibrosis. An age-delta was calculated as the difference between predicted age and chronological age. The volume and distribution of body fat was assessed from whole-body imaging. The association between fat phenotypes and cardiovascular age-delta was assessed using multivariable linear regression with age and sex as co-covariates, reporting β coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two-sample Mendelian randomization was used to assess causal associations. RESULTS: Visceral adipose tissue volume [β = 0.656, (95% CI, .537-.775), P < .0001], muscle adipose tissue infiltration [β = 0.183, (95% CI, .122-.244), P = .0003], and liver fat fraction [β = 1.066, (95% CI .835-1.298), P < .0001] were the strongest predictors of increased cardiovascular age-delta for both sexes. Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue volume [β = 0.432, (95% CI, .269-.596), P < .0001] and android fat mass [β = 0.983, (95% CI, .64-1.326), P < .0001] were each associated with increased age-delta only in males. Genetically predicted gynoid fat showed an association with decreased age-delta. CONCLUSIONS: Shared and sex-specific patterns of body fat are associated with both protective and harmful changes in cardiovascular ageing, highlighting adipose tissue distribution and function as a key target for interventions to extend healthy lifespan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".