MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413419973 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000213688

Changes in Gray Matter Morphology and White Matter Microstructure Across the Adult Lifespan in People With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

2025· article· en· W4413419973 on OpenAlexaff
Judy Chen, Alexander Ngo, Raúl Rodríguez‐Cruces, Jessica Royer, Maria Eugenia Caligiuri, Antonio Gambardella, Luis Concha, Simon S. Keller, Fernando Cendes, Clarissa Lin Yasuda, Marina K. M. Alvim, Leonardo Bonilha, Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht, Niels K. Focke, Barbara A. K. Kreilkamp, Martin Domín, Felix von Podewils, Sönke Langner, Christian Rummel, Roland Wiest, Pascal Martin, Raviteja Kotikalapudi, Benjamin Bender, Terence J. O’Brien, Benjamin Sinclair, Lucy Vivash, Patrick Kwan, Patricia Desmond, Elaine Lui, Gian Marco Duma, Paolo Bonanni, Alice Ballerini, Anna Elisabetta Vaudano, Stefano Meletti, Manuela Tondelli, Saud Alhusaini, Colin P. Doherty, Gianpiero L. Cavalleri, Norman Delanty, Reetta Kälviäinen, Graeme D. Jackson, Magdalena Kowalczyk, Mario Mascalchi, Mira Semmelroch, Rhys H. Thomas, Hamid Soltanian‐Zadeh, Esmaeil Davoodi‐Bojd, Junsong Zhang, Matteo Lenge, Renzo Guerrini, Emanuele Bartolini, Khalid Hamandi, Sonya Foley, Theodor Rüber, Tobias Bauer, Bernd Weber, Benoît Caldairou, Chantal Depondt, Julie Absil, Sarah J. A. Carr, Eugenio Abela, Mark P. Richardson, Orrin Devinsky, Heath Pardoe, Mariasavina Severino, Domenico Tortora, Erik Kaestner, Sean N. Hatton, Donatello Arienzo, Sjoerd B. Vos, Mina Ryten, Peter N. Taylor, John S. Duncan, Christopher D. Whelan, Marian Galovic, Gavin P. Winston, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Paul M. Thompson, Sanjay M. Sisodiya, Angelo Labate, Carrie R. McDonald, Lorenzo Caciagli, Neda Bernasconi, Andrea Bernasconi, Sara Larivière, Dewi Schrader, Boris C. Bernhardt

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill UniversityBC Children's HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGray (unit)White matterEpilepsyTemporal lobeBrain morphometryPsychologyNeuroscienceAnatomyMedicineMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is commonly associated with mesiotemporal pathology and widespread alterations of gray and white matter structures. Evidence supports a progressive condition, although the temporal evolution of TLE is poorly defined. In this ENIGMA-Epilepsy study, we aim to investigate structural alterations in gray and white matter across the adult lifespan in patients with TLE by charting both gray and white matter changes and explore the covariance of age-related alterations in both compartments. METHODS: scores of all patients. Covariance analyses examined the coupled correlations of gray and white matter lifespan curves for each region. RESULTS: < 0.05). Changes spanned the adult time window and effects exceeded typical aging-related processes in patients at the level of cortical thickness, subcortical volume, and diffusion measures, particularly in patients older than 55 years. Covariance analyses revealed strong associations across multiple white matter tracts, subcortical structures, and cortical regions within and beyond the temporolimbic system. DISCUSSION: This study highlights that patients with TLE exhibit more pronounced and widespread gray and white matter atrophy across the lifespan. The cross-sectional nature of our study limits definitive conclusions on whether the atrophy shown is progressive but emphasizes the importance of prompt diagnosis and intervention in patients. Collectively, our results motivate future longitudinal studies to clarify consequences of drug-resistant epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207