How can community-based organizations be involved in the contraception care pathway for newcomer youth? Results of knowledge translation workshops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite being a basic right of all individuals, many newcomer youth in Canada face challenges in accessing sexual and reproductive health (SRH), including contraception care. Settlement service providers are a trusted source for newcomers in the community, and we explored their role in supporting equitable access to SRH. We conducted an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) intervention involving two workshops and the development of an infographic to explore the barriers and opportunities for settlement service organizations to participate in the SRH care pathway for newcomer youth. SRH and contraception topics arise when youth access other services, such as violence prevention and mental health programming. Lack of training and resources limits their ability to support youth. Workshop participants expressed interest in training and resources and identified opportunities to strengthen the referral pathways to support youth's access to SRH. Providing resources and training can bolster settlement service providers' awareness of newcomer youth's SRH needs and improve their capacity to support them with information. Our work identified settlement service providers as important in strengthening the SRH care pathway for newcomer youth. We demonstrated the need and opportunity to reach newcomer youth with SRH information by providing training and resources to settlement service providers. • We conducted an integrated knowledge translation project to explore the barriers and opportunities for settlement service organizations to participate in the sexual and reproductive health care (SRH) pathway for newcomer youth through. • We found that SRH comes up when youth access services such as violence prevention and mental health programming. • Settlement service providers identified a need for resources and training on SRH. • Addressing these needs can bolster settlement service providers' capacities to provide SRH information tonewcomer youth and potentially make SRH care more accessible to newcomer youth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.049 | 0.104 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".