Cooperative Schemes for Joint Latency and Energy Consumption Minimization in UAV-MEC Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) has promoted emerging applications that require massive device collaboration, heavy computation, and stringent latency. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) systems can provide flexible services for user devices (UDs) with wide coverage. The optimization of both latency and energy consumption remains a critical yet challenging task due to the inherent trade-off between them. Joint association, offloading, and computing resource allocation are essential to achieving satisfying system performance. However, these processes are difficult due to the highly dynamic environment and the exponentially increasing complexity of large-scale networks. To address these challenges, we introduce a carefully designed cost function to balance the latency and the energy consumption, formulate the joint problem into a partially observable Markov decision process, and propose two multi-agent deep-reinforcement-learning-based schemes to tackle the long-term problem. Specifically, the multi-agent proximal policy optimization (MAPPO)-based scheme uses centralized learning and decentralized execution, while the closed-form enhanced multi-armed bandit (CF-MAB)-based scheme decouples association from offloading and computing resource allocation. In both schemes, UDs act as independent agents that learn from environmental interactions and historic decisions, make decision to maximize its individual reward function, and achieve implicit collaboration through the reward mechanism. The numerical results validate the effectiveness and show the superiority of our proposed schemes. The MAPPO-based scheme enables collaborative agent decisions for high performance in complex dynamic environments, while the CF-MAB-based scheme supports independent rapid response decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".