MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413428099 · doi:10.14740/jmc5154

Pure Red Cell Aplasia After ABO-Incompatible Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Successfully Treated With Daratumumab: Report of Two Cases

2025· article· en· W4413428099 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martín Milanesio, Mercedes de Jesús García, Leandro Roberto Castellanos, Evelin Luciana Pirazzini, Virginia Damonte, Ana Lisa Basquiera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDaratumumabABO blood group systemPure red cell aplasiaHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationAplasiaStem cellImmunologySurgeryMultiple myelomaBortezomibBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a potential complication after ABO-incompatible allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). In case where PRCA persists beyond 60 days post-HCT, spontaneous resolution is rare, and therapeutic intervention is typically required. However, there is currently no established standard of care for its management. We report two cases of post-transplant PRCA that were refractory to conventional therapies, including erythropoietin and rituximab, and were successfully treated with daratumumab. These cases underscore the potential role of daratumumab as an effective therapeutic option in the management of PRCA following ABO-incompatible HCT. Given the limited data available on its use in this setting, our report contributes with valuable clinical evidence supporting its efficacy and safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→