An Unusual Entity in Urology: Urinary Bladder Paraganglioma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bladder paraganglioma accounts for < 0.05% of all bladder tumors, and very few cases have been reported to date. Because clinical and radiological findings are often nonspecific, many lesions are misdiagnosed until surgery, exposing patients to preventable perioperative catecholamine crises. We report an unusual case of a 77-year-old woman, in whom a 17-mm bladder paraganglioma was discovered incidentally during imaging for suspected Crohn's disease. The patient was entirely asymptomatic and had normal catecholamine levels. Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) achieved complete excision, and no recurrence was detected at 6-month follow-up. This case illustrates that bladder paraganglioma can occur outside the typical age range and without adrenergic symptoms, emphasizing the need to consider this entity in the differential diagnosis of any well-circumscribed, hypervascular bladder mass. Early recognition enables appropriate perioperative planning and long-term multidisciplinary surveillance. We discuss the tumor's characteristics, management, and the importance of long-term surveillance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".