MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-Targeted Analysis Workflow of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Ovarian Follicular Fluid: Identification of Parabens by Diagnostic Fragmentation Evidence and Additional Contaminants via Mass Spectral Library Matching

2025· article· en· W4413434283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Measurement Science Au · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHealth Canada
FundersHealth CanadaGovernment of CanadaAustralian Government
KeywordsFollicular fluidFragmentation (computing)WorkflowEndocrine systemIdentification (biology)ContaminationSpectral analysisChemistryComputational biologyComputer scienceInternal medicineMedicineBiologyHormoneDatabasePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Ubiquitously distributed in the environment, food supply, and consumer products, endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are exogenous substances that disrupt hormonal activities in the endocrine system. Increasing evidence suggests that women with reproductive disorders tend to accumulate higher levels of EDCs, such as phthalates and parabens, in ovarian follicular fluid. However, most existing studies focus on the measurements of a limited number of prevalent EDCs, overlooking chemicals and metabolites that are not known or prioritized. To address the knowledge gap, we developed a non-targeted analysis (NTA) workflow for broader EDC detection in follicular fluid samples using liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS). By taking advantage of the higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) in the Orbitrap mass spectrometer, we first identified up to 17 characteristic product ions for parabens and their metabolites. Compared to conventional mass spectral matching via online databases and in silico fragmentation algorithms, paraben precursor ion prioritization through such diagnostic fragment ion extraction achieved more accurate compound identification at concentrations as low as 1 ng/mL. To extend the chemical coverage beyond known fragmentation patterns, we also assessed mass spectral library search via Compound Discoverer software, along with retention time model predictions. As a proof-of-concept application, the entire workflow was applied to a pooled follicular fluid sample collected from 211 Canadian patients receiving fertility treatment. Our compound identification results revealed that parabens could undergo several possible metabolic pathways, including hydrolysis, hydroxylation, sulfation, and amino acid conjugation. Furthermore, a total of 14 compounds were identified with level 1 confidence, including EDCs and their metabolites such as monophthalates, UV filters, and phenolic acids. The underlying implications of reproductive health associated with these substances are an area for future study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it