MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of the variability of morphometric and external parameters of female kamloops trout using modern mathematical statistics methods

2025· article· en· W4413434478 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Volkova, E. Klyukina, Ю. Ф. Каменев

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics and breeding of animals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroutGeographyStatisticsPhysical geographyBiologyFisheryMathematicsFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the presented work was to study the variability of morphometric and exterior characteristics of female kamloops trout, to find the dependence of female weight on morphometric characteristics. Materials and methods. The research was conducted in November 2023 at the Parola fish farm located in Lake Ladoga. The object is three—year-old rainbow trout of the kamloops breed of Finnish origin. The planting material was brought to the fish farm in the spring of 2020 and was grown in cages. Upon reaching the age of three, 86 females with optimal phenotype parameters were selected and labeled from the total group of fish. The selected livestock was evaluated according to a number of indicators: external inspection, body measurements, morphometric and exterior. Studies of the variability of some morphobiological characteristics and body weight of female rainbow trout of the kamloops breed were carried out using modern mathematical statistics methods. Results. It was revealed that the normal weight of three-year-old female rainbow trout of the Kamloops breed is in the range of 4218...7595 g, the normal total body length is 62,2...74,4 cm, the normal commercial body length is 57,8...69,6 cm, the normal Smith length is 60.8...74.3 cm, the normal high-spin index is 31,3...38,2, the normal bighead index — 20,1...24,8, the normal fatness coefficient is 1,5...2,2. It is recommended to take this into account when carrying out breeding work and fish selection during reproduction. As a result of regression analysis, adequate power-law models were obtained that describe the relationship between the body weight of female kamloops trout and the main morphometric features: total body length, fishing length, body length according to Smith, the highest body height, the largest body girth, and head length, which can be used to predict the body weight of female kamloops trout. Conclusion. The results obtained make it possible to better assess the growth and changes in the linear weight and exterior parameters of fish during cultivation, and are also of great practical importance when carrying out breeding work with rainbow trout of the Kamloops breed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetics and breeding of animalsSame topicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesFrench-language works237,207