MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Livestock of specialized beef cattle breeds, state of beef production and industrial use of cows in Russia (review)

2025· article· en· W4413434763 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Konik, V. Chefranov, Nataliya Victorovna Solotova, L.V. Annikova, I. V. Bogatyreva

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics and breeding of animals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Industry and Aquatic Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeef cattleLivestockProduction (economics)Animal productionAnimal scienceBeef industryAgricultural scienceBusinessEnvironmental scienceGeographyBiologyForestryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: to analyze the livestock population of the main beef breeds, the state of beef production and the industrial use of cows. Materials and methods. The methodological basis of the study was made up of systematization techniques, logical and comparative statistical analysis. The analysis was carried out using domestic and foreign bibliographic databases, yearbooks on breeding work in beef cattle breeding in farms of the country. Results. Regardless of the analysis period, the largest number of livestock was observed in the Kalmyk breed, the proportion of which amounted to 30,5—33,8 % of all probonitized cattle of beef breeds and increased by 3,3 abs. % compared to 2022. The number of Aberdeen Angus cattle in 2022 amounted to 26,5 % of the total number of beef breeds, while a year later it decreased to 16,9 %, which was less than the number of all other studied breeds. With the exception of Aberdeen Angus, the number of probonitized livestock of Kalmyk, Kazakh White-Headed and Hereford breeds increased, although slightly. Of all the analyzed beef cattle breeds, Aberdeen Angus cattle had an earlier age at the first insemination, with values of 16 months, followed by representatives of the Kalmyk breed (23,8 months), which indicates the late maturity of these animals. The remaining breeds were inseminated in the period of 18—20 months and occupied an intermediate position between the extreme values of the trait. In terms of age of withdrawal from the herds, the best values were shown by cows of the Kalmyk and Kazakh White-Headed breeds, which averaged 6,8—6,9 calvings. Herefords were characterized by a lower age of cow retirement among the studied breeds, the values of which were 0,5—1,3 calvings lower. A low level of calf output per 100 Aberdeen Angus cows was revealed — 56 heads, which is lower than the indicators obtained from other breeds of meat productivity by 27— 29 heads. Conclusion. The results obtained make it possible to better assess the growth and changes in the linear weight and exterior parameters of fish during cultivation, and are also of great practical importance when carrying out breeding work with rainbow trout of the Kamloops breed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenetics and breeding of animalsSame topicFood Industry and Aquatic BiologyFrench-language works237,207