MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413435511 · doi:10.1101/2025.08.20.671231

Executive control in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A worldwide mega-analysis of task-based functional neuroimaging data of the ENIGMA-OCD consortium

2025· preprint· en· W4413435511 on OpenAlexaff
Nadža Džinalija, Ilya M. Veer, H. Blair Simpson, Iliyan Ivanov, Srinivas Balachander, Francesco Benedetti, Federico Calesella, Sophie Fitzsimmons, Rosa Grützmann, Kristen Hagen, Bjarne Hansen, Stephan Heinzel, Chaim Huyser, Jonathan Ipser, Fern Jaspers‐Fayer, Niels T. de Joode, Norbert Kathmann, Minah Kim, Jun Soo Kwon, Wenjuan Liu, Christine Löchner, Ignacio Martínez‐Zalacaín, José M. Menchón, Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy, Ian S. Olivier, Tjardo Postma, Y.C. Janardhan Reddy, Carles Soriano‐Mas, S. Evelyn Stewart, Sophia I. Thomopoulos, Anders Lillevik Thorsen, Benedetta Vai, Dick J. Veltman, Ganesan Venkatasubramanian, Valerie Voon, Lea Waller, Ysbrand D. van der Werf, Dan J. Stein, Paul R. Thompson, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Chris Vriend

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftThe Wellcome Trust DBT India AllianceNational Research Foundation of KoreaDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNational Research FoundationMedical Research CouncilSouth African Medical Research CouncilKorea Brain Research InstituteWellcome TrustMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesInternational OCD Foundation
KeywordsPrecuneusPsychologyDefault mode networkNeuroimagingExecutive functionsFunctional neuroimagingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingDorsolateral prefrontal cortexMiddle frontal gyrusPosterior cingulateAttentional controlAnterior cingulate cortexPrefrontal cortexCognitive psychologyNeuroscienceCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is associated with impaired executive function and altered activity in associated neural circuits, contributing to reduced goal-directed behavior. To investigate neural activation during executive control, we conducted a mega-analysis in the ENIGMA-OCD consortium pooling individual participant data from 475 individuals with OCD and 345 healthy controls across 15 fMRI tasks collected worldwide. Methods: Individual participant data was uniformly processed using HALFpipe to construct voxelwise statistical images of executive control and task load contrasts. Parameter estimates extracted from regions of interest were entered into multilevel Bayesian models to examine regional and whole-brain effects of diagnosis, and, within OCD, the influence of medication status, symptom severity, and age of onset on task activation. Results: We observed a robust task activation pattern across individuals with OCD and control participants in executive control regions across tasks. Relative to controls, individuals with OCD showed moderate to very strong evidence of weaker activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, precuneus, frontal eye fields, and inferior parietal lobule during executive control (all positive posterior probabilities [P+]<0.1). Individuals with OCD also showed stronger activation in regions of the default mode network during executive function relative to controls. We found little evidence for differential activation during executive control in task-positive regions related to disease onset, severity and medication status. Conclusion: In the first mega-analysis of fMRI studies of executive function in OCD, we found strong evidence of weaker frontoparietal activation during executive control tasks. Our findings also suggest a failure of default mode network regions to appropriately disengage during task performance in OCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207